Twitter may possibly be doing the job on a new function termed Articles
Twitter is supposedly performing on a new attribute identified as Article content, which could allow consumers to make prolonged, site-like posts that exceed the latest 280-character restrict per tweet. The attainable Articles or blog posts characteristic was 1st spotted and shared on Twitter by Jane Manchun Wong, who has been exposing future application functions for a few of many years now.
Twitter is performing on “Twitter Articles” and the potential to create a person inside Twitter
Risk a new longform structure on Twitter pic.twitter.com/Srk3E6R5sz
— Jane Manchun Wong (@wongmjane) February 2, 2022
Presently, there is not significantly facts about the new Articles characteristic. There are not any facts on when we could be expecting the new element and whether or not it would be available to all Twitter end users or be minimal only to particular people. There is also no mention of regardless of whether or not the posts will be monetized.Judging by the replies below Jane Manchun Wong’s tweet, persons have distinct views regarding the probable Content articles element.
In accordance to some Twitter people, Content articles would make Twitter much more of a blogging web page, very similar to Medium. Medium is a site system that was at first intended to publish writings that have been for a longer period than Twitter’s character restrict.
For some users, introducing the possibility of creating this sort of blog-like posts would perhaps minimize the engagement level on Twitter. As a Twitter consumer replied, an article wouldn’t be equipped to get hold of the range of impressions and engagements that Twitter threads do.
But there are, of course, a lot of users who assistance the idea of introducing extensive-sort posts to Twitter. A Twitter user even replied that they would desire to use that alternatively of preserving their own website.
What is your impression on the subject? Do you consider that Posts would be a positive addition to Twitter, or do you assume it would be a bad idea to introduce website-like posts to the platform?
Twitter is supposedly performing on a new attribute identified as Article content, which could allow consumers to make prolonged, site-like posts that exceed the latest 280-character restrict per tweet. The attainable Articles or blog posts characteristic was 1st spotted and shared on Twitter by Jane Manchun Wong, who has been exposing future application functions for a few of many years now.
Twitter is performing on “Twitter Articles” and the potential to create a person inside Twitter
Risk a new longform structure on Twitter pic.twitter.com/Srk3E6R5sz
— Jane Manchun Wong (@wongmjane) February 2, 2022
Presently, there is not significantly facts about the new Articles characteristic. There are not any facts on when we could be expecting the new element and whether or not it would be available to all Twitter end users or be minimal only to particular people. There is also no mention of regardless of whether or not the posts will be monetized.Judging by the replies below Jane Manchun Wong’s tweet, persons have distinct views regarding the probable Content articles element.
In accordance to some Twitter people, Content articles would make Twitter much more of a blogging web page, very similar to Medium. Medium is a site system that was at first intended to publish writings that have been for a longer period than Twitter’s character restrict.
For some users, introducing the possibility of creating this sort of blog-like posts would perhaps minimize the engagement level on Twitter. As a Twitter consumer replied, an article wouldn’t be equipped to get hold of the range of impressions and engagements that Twitter threads do.
But there are, of course, a lot of users who assistance the idea of introducing extensive-sort posts to Twitter. A Twitter user even replied that they would desire to use that alternatively of preserving their own website.
What is your impression on the subject? Do you consider that Posts would be a positive addition to Twitter, or do you assume it would be a bad idea to introduce website-like posts to the platform?
